1inch vs Bitget Wallet
Neutral on-chain benchmarking of slippage, revert rates, and overall execution quality.
Bitget Wallet shows tighter execution than 1inch on ClearTrace's on-chain slippage benchmark, 97.5 vs 94.4 out of 100 (a 3.1-point edge), measured across 4,552 and 35,383 benchmarked trades. Slippage, revert rate, and MEV exposure are scored separately. (data as of August 17, 2026)
Protocol Scorecard
| 1inch | Bitget Wallet | |
|---|---|---|
| Slippage Score (0-100) | 94.4 | 97.5 |
| Revert Rate (bot-filtered) | 1.54% | 2.65% |
| Trades Analyzed | 35,383 | 4,552 |
1inch and Bitget Wallet are both DEX aggregators: rather than holding liquidity themselves, they split each order across many underlying pools to find the best available price. Because both compete on routing quality, the difference between them shows up in execution — realized slippage and MEV exposure — far more than in their headline rates.
Across the trades ClearTrace benchmarked, Bitget Wallet posted a slippage score of 97.5/100 versus 94.4/100 for 1inch — a meaningful but not decisive edge of 3.1 points. The score reflects realized slippage only — derived from median slippage versus a 1-minute VWAP, where a higher number means lower slippage. MEV exposure and revert rates are tracked as separate metrics. Bitget Wallet was measured over 4,552 trades and 1inch over 35,383.
The sample sizes differ substantially (1inch: 35,383 trades; Bitget Wallet: 4,552), so Bitget Wallet's score reflects a narrower slice of activity and may move as more volume is observed.
The other axis is reliability: a swap that reverts on-chain still costs gas and a missed price. After a sender-level filter that excludes solver and MEV-bot spam (methodology v5), 1inch's revert rate is 1.54% of 217,847 routing transactions versus 2.65% of 97,803 for Bitget Wallet, tx-weighted across chains. Rates are recalculated on every data refresh; the live aggregator leaderboard carries the current per-chain numbers.
On this data, Bitget Wallet holds the stronger slippage score, but the gap reflects routing and slippage differences rather than one venue being universally better — results shift with trade size, token pair, and market conditions, and MEV exposure and revert rates are separate considerations. Scores update on each data refresh; see our methodology for the full approach.
Execution-quality research, in your inbox
Periodic on-chain findings on DEX slippage, revert rates, and aggregator routing. No spam.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better execution quality, 1inch or Bitget Wallet?
Based on ClearTrace's slippage score (median slippage vs a VWAP baseline), Bitget Wallet edges out 1inch, 97.5/100 versus 94.4/100 (a 3.1-point gap).
Does 1inch or Bitget Wallet offer better MEV protection?
ClearTrace publishes a slippage-based score and per-aggregator revert rates — not a per-aggregator MEV-protection score. On slippage, Bitget Wallet was tighter (~2.5 bps vs ~5.6 bps). For MEV specifically, the dashboard surfaces detected sandwich activity as a separate metric.
Is 1inch or Bitget Wallet better for large trades?
For large orders, aggregators such as 1inch can split a trade across multiple pools to reduce price impact, which often helps on size. The right venue still depends on the specific pair and amount — the live dashboard tracks current execution quality.
What is the revert rate of 1inch vs Bitget Wallet?
A revert is a swap transaction that fails on-chain — the trader pays gas but gets no fill. After ClearTrace's sender-level filter that excludes solver and MEV-bot spam, 1inch's revert rate is 1.54% and Bitget Wallet's is 2.65% of tracked routing transactions, tx-weighted across chains. Rates are recalculated on every data refresh; per-chain numbers are on the ClearTrace aggregator leaderboard.