Bitget Wallet vs KyberSwap
Neutral on-chain benchmarking of slippage, revert rates, and overall execution quality.
Bitget Wallet shows tighter execution than KyberSwap on ClearTrace's on-chain slippage benchmark, 96.5 vs 91.5 out of 100 (a 5.0-point edge), measured across 7,401 and 45,504 benchmarked trades. Slippage, revert rate, and MEV exposure are scored separately. (data as of July 15, 2026)
Protocol Scorecard
| Bitget Wallet | KyberSwap | |
|---|---|---|
| Slippage Score (0-100) | 96.5 | 91.5 |
| Revert Rate (bot-filtered) | 1.7% | 2.24% |
| Trades Analyzed | 7,401 | 45,504 |
Bitget Wallet and KyberSwap are both DEX aggregators: rather than holding liquidity themselves, they split each order across many underlying pools to find the best available price. Because both compete on routing quality, the difference between them shows up in execution — realized slippage and MEV exposure — far more than in their headline rates.
Across the trades ClearTrace benchmarked, Bitget Wallet posted a slippage score of 96.5/100 versus 91.5/100 for KyberSwap — a clear edge of 5.0 points. The score reflects realized slippage only — derived from median slippage versus a 1-minute VWAP, where a higher number means lower slippage. MEV exposure and revert rates are tracked as separate metrics. Bitget Wallet was measured over 7,401 trades and KyberSwap over 45,504.
The sample sizes differ substantially (KyberSwap: 45,504 trades; Bitget Wallet: 7,401), so Bitget Wallet's score reflects a narrower slice of activity and may move as more volume is observed.
The other axis is reliability: a swap that reverts on-chain still costs gas and a missed price. After a sender-level filter that excludes solver and MEV-bot spam (methodology v5), Bitget Wallet's revert rate is 1.7% of 126,417 routing transactions versus 2.24% of 710,506 for KyberSwap, tx-weighted across chains. Rates are recalculated on every data refresh; the live aggregator leaderboard carries the current per-chain numbers.
On this data, Bitget Wallet holds the stronger slippage score, but the gap reflects routing and slippage differences rather than one venue being universally better — results shift with trade size, token pair, and market conditions, and MEV exposure and revert rates are separate considerations. Scores update on each data refresh; see our methodology for the full approach.
Execution-quality research, in your inbox
Periodic on-chain findings on DEX slippage, revert rates, and aggregator routing. No spam.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better execution quality, Bitget Wallet or KyberSwap?
Based on ClearTrace's slippage score (median slippage vs a VWAP baseline), Bitget Wallet edges out KyberSwap, 96.5/100 versus 91.5/100 (a 5.0-point gap).
Does Bitget Wallet or KyberSwap offer better MEV protection?
ClearTrace publishes a slippage-based score and per-aggregator revert rates — not a per-aggregator MEV-protection score. On slippage, Bitget Wallet was tighter (~3.5 bps vs ~8.5 bps). For MEV specifically, the dashboard surfaces detected sandwich activity as a separate metric.
Is Bitget Wallet or KyberSwap better for large trades?
For large orders, aggregators such as Bitget Wallet can split a trade across multiple pools to reduce price impact, which often helps on size. The right venue still depends on the specific pair and amount — the live dashboard tracks current execution quality.
What is the revert rate of Bitget Wallet vs KyberSwap?
A revert is a swap transaction that fails on-chain — the trader pays gas but gets no fill. After ClearTrace's sender-level filter that excludes solver and MEV-bot spam, Bitget Wallet's revert rate is 1.7% and KyberSwap's is 2.24% of tracked routing transactions, tx-weighted across chains. Rates are recalculated on every data refresh; per-chain numbers are on the ClearTrace aggregator leaderboard.