KyberSwap vs Uniswap
Neutral on-chain benchmarking of slippage, revert rates, and overall execution quality.
Uniswap shows tighter execution than KyberSwap on ClearTrace's on-chain slippage benchmark on Ethereum, 84.9 vs 81.4 out of 100 (a 3.5-point edge), measured across 428,524 and 16,607 benchmarked transactions there. Slippage, revert rate, and MEV exposure are scored separately. The ordering is not the same on every chain these two share: Base (KyberSwap ahead by 6.8); Optimism (KyberSwap ahead by 8.0). ClearTrace publishes one chain rather than a blend, so read this as a finding about Ethereum. (data as of September 29, 2026)
Protocol Scorecard
| KyberSwap | Uniswap | |
|---|---|---|
| Slippage Score (0-100) | 81.4 Ethereum |
84.9 Ethereum |
| Trades Analyzed Ethereum |
16,607 | 428,524 |
KyberSwap is a DEX aggregator that routes and splits orders across many venues, while Uniswap is a single automated market maker (AMM) trading against its own pools. The practical question is whether KyberSwap's routing and MEV-aware order flow actually beats trading directly on Uniswap. Note that KyberSwap can itself route through Uniswap pools, so this measures the value of aggregation, not rival liquidity.
Across the flow ClearTrace benchmarked, Uniswap posted a slippage score of 84.9/100 versus 81.4/100 for KyberSwap, a meaningful but not decisive edge of 3.5 points on Ethereum. Ethereum is ClearTrace's publication chain: ClearTrace compares a pair on its publication chain when both venues are benchmarked there, and otherwise on the shared chain carrying the most data on the smaller side. Either way the comparison is one chain, not one venue's all-chain rollup set against another's, because two rollups cover different chains. The ordering is not the same on every chain these two share: Base (KyberSwap ahead by 6.8); Optimism (KyberSwap ahead by 8.0). ClearTrace publishes one chain rather than a blend, so read this as a finding about Ethereum. The score reflects realized slippage only, derived from median slippage versus a minute-level off-chain reference price (Dune prices.usd, an interpolated 5-minute exchange-aggregate feed and not a VWAP), where a higher number means lower slippage. The median is taken over individual fills, while the counts below are distinct transactions, and one transaction can contain several fills. MEV exposure and revert rates are tracked as separate metrics. Uniswap was measured over 428,524 benchmarked transactions (27% of its benchmarked flow) and KyberSwap over 16,607 benchmarked transactions (25% of its benchmarked flow).
The sample sizes differ substantially (Uniswap: 428,524 transactions; KyberSwap: 16,607), so KyberSwap's score reflects a narrower slice of activity and may move as more volume is observed.
On this data, Uniswap holds the stronger slippage score on Ethereum, but the gap reflects routing and slippage differences rather than one venue being universally better. That edge is a statement about Ethereum. Results shift with trade size, token pair, and market conditions, and MEV exposure and revert rates are separate considerations. Scores update on each data refresh; see our methodology for the full approach.
Execution-quality research, in your inbox
Periodic on-chain findings on DEX slippage, revert rates, and aggregator routing. No spam.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better execution quality, KyberSwap or Uniswap?
Based on ClearTrace's slippage score (median slippage vs a minute-level off-chain reference price from Dune prices.usd, which is not a VWAP) on Ethereum, ClearTrace's publication chain, Uniswap edges out KyberSwap, 84.9/100 versus 81.4/100 (a 3.5-point gap). ClearTrace compares the two on one shared chain rather than setting one venue's all-chain rollup against another's. The ordering is not the same on every chain these two share: Base (KyberSwap ahead by 6.8); Optimism (KyberSwap ahead by 8.0). ClearTrace publishes one chain rather than a blend, so read this as a finding about Ethereum.
Does KyberSwap or Uniswap offer better MEV protection?
ClearTrace publishes a slippage-based score and per-aggregator revert rates, not a per-aggregator MEV-protection score. On slippage, Uniswap was tighter on Ethereum (~15.1 bps vs ~18.6 bps). For MEV specifically, the dashboard surfaces detected sandwich activity as a separate metric.
Is KyberSwap or Uniswap better for large trades?
For large orders, aggregators such as KyberSwap can split a trade across multiple pools to reduce price impact, which often helps on size. The right venue still depends on the specific pair and amount. The live dashboard tracks current execution quality.