On-Chain Execution Data

ParaSwap vs Uniswap

Neutral on-chain benchmarking of slippage, revert rates, and overall execution quality.

Protocol Scorecard

ParaSwap
Uniswap
Slippage Score (0-100)
76.7
87.4
Trades Analyzed
10,956
1,355,435

ParaSwap is a DEX aggregator that routes and splits orders across many venues, while Uniswap is a single automated market maker (AMM) trading against its own pools. The practical question is whether ParaSwap's routing and MEV-aware order flow actually beats trading directly on Uniswap. Note that ParaSwap can itself route through Uniswap pools, so this measures the value of aggregation, not rival liquidity.

Across the trades ClearTrace benchmarked, Uniswap posted a slippage score of 87.4/100 versus 76.7/100 for ParaSwap — a clear edge of 10.7 points. The score reflects realized slippage only — derived from median slippage versus a 1-minute VWAP, where a higher number means lower slippage. MEV exposure and revert rates are tracked as separate metrics. Uniswap was measured over 1,355,435 trades and ParaSwap over 10,956.

The sample sizes differ substantially (Uniswap: 1,355,435 trades; ParaSwap: 10,956), so ParaSwap's score reflects a narrower slice of activity and may move as more volume is observed.

On this data, Uniswap holds the stronger slippage score, but the gap reflects routing and slippage differences rather than one venue being universally better — results shift with trade size, token pair, and market conditions, and MEV exposure and revert rates are separate considerations. Scores update on each data refresh; see our methodology for the full approach.

View Live Data Dashboard

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has better execution quality, ParaSwap or Uniswap?

Based on ClearTrace's slippage score (median slippage vs a VWAP baseline), Uniswap edges out ParaSwap, 87.4/100 versus 76.7/100 (a 10.7-point gap).

Does ParaSwap or Uniswap offer better MEV protection?

ClearTrace publishes a slippage-based score and per-aggregator revert rates — not a per-aggregator MEV-protection score. On slippage, Uniswap was tighter (~12.6 bps vs ~23.3 bps). For MEV specifically, the dashboard surfaces detected sandwich activity as a separate metric.

Is ParaSwap or Uniswap better for large trades?

For large orders, aggregators such as ParaSwap can split a trade across multiple pools to reduce price impact, which often helps on size. The right venue still depends on the specific pair and amount — the live dashboard tracks current execution quality.