SushiSwap vs Uniswap
Neutral on-chain benchmarking of slippage, revert rates, and overall execution quality.
Uniswap shows tighter execution than SushiSwap on ClearTrace's on-chain slippage benchmark, 88.8 vs 79.9 out of 100 (a 8.9-point edge), measured across 1,265,229 and 22,828 benchmarked trades. Slippage, revert rate, and MEV exposure are scored separately. (data as of July 15, 2026)
Protocol Scorecard
| SushiSwap | Uniswap | |
|---|---|---|
| Slippage Score (0-100) | 79.9 | 88.8 |
| Trades Analyzed | 22,828 | 1,265,229 |
SushiSwap and Uniswap are both decentralized exchanges (AMMs), where trades execute directly against on-chain liquidity pools. The comparison comes down to pool depth, fee tiers, and how exposed each venue's order flow is to MEV such as sandwich attacks.
Across the trades ClearTrace benchmarked, Uniswap posted a slippage score of 88.8/100 versus 79.9/100 for SushiSwap — a clear edge of 8.9 points. The score reflects realized slippage only — derived from median slippage versus a 1-minute VWAP, where a higher number means lower slippage. MEV exposure and revert rates are tracked as separate metrics. Uniswap was measured over 1,265,229 trades and SushiSwap over 22,828.
The sample sizes differ substantially (Uniswap: 1,265,229 trades; SushiSwap: 22,828), so SushiSwap's score reflects a narrower slice of activity and may move as more volume is observed.
On this data, Uniswap holds the stronger slippage score, but the gap reflects routing and slippage differences rather than one venue being universally better — results shift with trade size, token pair, and market conditions, and MEV exposure and revert rates are separate considerations. Scores update on each data refresh; see our methodology for the full approach.
Execution-quality research, in your inbox
Periodic on-chain findings on DEX slippage, revert rates, and aggregator routing. No spam.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better execution quality, SushiSwap or Uniswap?
Based on ClearTrace's slippage score (median slippage vs a VWAP baseline), Uniswap edges out SushiSwap, 88.8/100 versus 79.9/100 (a 8.9-point gap).
Does SushiSwap or Uniswap offer better MEV protection?
ClearTrace publishes a slippage-based score and per-aggregator revert rates — not a per-aggregator MEV-protection score. On slippage, Uniswap was tighter (~11.2 bps vs ~20.1 bps). For MEV specifically, the dashboard surfaces detected sandwich activity as a separate metric.
Is SushiSwap or Uniswap better for large trades?
For large orders, the venue with deeper liquidity for your pair usually wins on price impact. Both SushiSwap and Uniswap are AMMs, so compare pool depth for your token pair; the live dashboard tracks current execution quality.