SushiSwap vs Uniswap
Neutral on-chain benchmarking of execution quality, MEV protection, and overall trade execution.
Protocol Scorecard
SushiSwap and Uniswap are both decentralized exchanges (AMMs), where trades execute directly against on-chain liquidity pools. The comparison comes down to pool depth, fee tiers, and how exposed each venue's order flow is to MEV such as sandwich attacks.
Across the trades ClearTrace benchmarked, Uniswap posted an execution-quality score of 87.5/100 versus 80.6/100 for SushiSwap — a clear edge of 6.9 points. The score blends realized slippage with an MEV/toxicity measure, so a higher number means traders kept more of their expected value. Uniswap was measured over 1,402,918 trades and SushiSwap over 25,395.
The sample sizes differ substantially (Uniswap: 1,402,918 trades; SushiSwap: 25,395), so SushiSwap's score reflects a narrower slice of activity and may move as more volume is observed.
On this data, Uniswap holds the stronger execution-quality score, but the gap reflects routing and MEV protection rather than one venue being universally better — results shift with trade size, token pair, and market conditions. We recalculate these scores on every data refresh; see our methodology for the full approach.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has better execution quality, SushiSwap or Uniswap?
Based on ClearTrace's on-chain benchmarking, Uniswap edges out SushiSwap on execution quality, 87.5/100 versus 80.6/100 (a 6.9-point gap).
Does SushiSwap or Uniswap offer better MEV protection?
MEV protection is captured by our toxicity measure, where lower is better. SushiSwap scored a toxicity of 19.4 and Uniswap 12.5, so Uniswap showed somewhat stronger protection against value extraction such as sandwich attacks over the sample.
Is SushiSwap or Uniswap better for large trades?
For large orders, the venue with deeper liquidity for your pair usually wins on price impact. Both SushiSwap and Uniswap are AMMs, so compare pool depth for your token pair; the live dashboard tracks current execution quality.