ClearTrace Scorecard · Edition 1 of a recurring series

DEX Aggregator Execution Scorecard
Edition 1 — July 2026

The rated record of DEX aggregator execution quality: quote accuracy, execution slippage, revert rates, and RFQ routing at size — measured the same way for every aggregator, by a third party with no routing product, and frozen so it can't be edited after the fact.

Chain: Ethereum  ·  Data frozen: 2026-07-04 04:04 UTC  ·  Published: 2026-07-04  ·  Snapshot: scorecard-edition-1.json
SHA-256: a010d40ed952cb8701b96a1bc9c1d00745c3447fd3858b8ef86eca6208d56bb3

Why a rated edition exists

Every aggregator claims best price and high reliability, and those claims are self-reported — published by the routing product being measured. Meanwhile, since 1 July 2026, MiCA transposes MiFID-style best-execution duties into crypto: best-ex must be evidenced, with multi-year record-keeping, not asserted. Compliance dashboards (e.g. DefiLlama's MiCA tracker) cover exchange-level obligations — not execution quality at the routing layer, where the trades actually happen.

This scorecard is the missing instrument: a neutral, methodology-published, third-party rated record. Each edition is numbered, dated, and hashed. A rating you can cite in a governance forum, a marketing page, or a best-execution file — and one nobody (including us) can quietly back-date or revise.

Edition 1 findings

Post-publication note (2026-07-05). A sender-concentration audit run after this edition froze found that the Odos revert figure below is dominated by address-rotating solver bots, not user transactions failing — the rate experienced by genuine Odos users on Ethereum is ≈0.2%. Revert methodology moved to v5 (a stronger sender-level bot filter) on 2026-07-05 and Edition 2 will use it. Per this scorecard's integrity model, the Edition 1 snapshot, its findings text, and its SHA-256 hash are unchanged — the record stays frozen, and corrections are published as dated notes like this one. The other findings are unaffected.

The rated table

Rated = ≥30 realized fork-simulation quote samples spanning ≥7 days. On-chain metrics (slippage, reverts) cover all trades/transactions in the window, not a sample. Baseline = the direct-venue default aggregators are implicitly compared against.

AggregatorStatusExec slippageRevert rate RFQ @ $1MQuote gapQuote nRouting txs
Bitget DEXon-chain only2.32 bps1.29%52,904
1inchrated7.02 bps2.16%0%0 bps96899,483
Bebopon-chain only9.73 bps8.05%106,185
Uniswap (direct venue)baseline10.54 bps1.61%0%0 bps1,00110,774
KyberSwaprated12.08 bps4.28%86%2.87 bps920137,934
Odosrated14.3 bps23.78%0%0 bps8312,090
CoW Protocolon-chain only15.72 bps0.11%47,118
OpenOceanon-chain only16.42 bps10.95%13,892
1inch Limit Order Protocolon-chain only27.67 bps0.84%30,111
SushiSwapon-chain only34.9 bps4.8%26,313
ParaSwap (Velora)rated43.01 bps3.83%0%1 bps97725,572
Tokenlonon-chain only64.48 bps0.04%2,789
DODO Xon-chain only0.15%6,886

Verify this edition

The findings above are computed from a frozen snapshot. To verify nothing has changed since publication, hash the snapshot and compare:

curl -s https://cleartracedata.com/static/data/scorecard-edition-1.json | shasum -a 256
a010d40ed952cb8701b96a1bc9c1d00745c3447fd3858b8ef86eca6208d56bb3

The snapshot is committed to a public git history at publication time, which independently timestamps it.

Methodology & scope

Full methodology: cleartracedata.com/methodology and the open-dataset README. In brief: execution slippage is the median per-fill gap vs a 1-minute VWAP oracle over all on-chain trades; revert rate counts failed routing transactions from raw on-chain data; quote accuracy is a forward-captured fork-simulation sample (quoted vs realized); RFQ share is measured from the same sampler at $1M notional. Aggregators we don't yet quote-sample appear with on-chain metrics only. Preliminary cells are shown but never rated. Scope: Ethereum for this edition; the live leaderboard is the free preview layer that accrues between editions.

Cite or commission

Cite this edition as: ClearTrace DEX Aggregator Execution Scorecard, Edition 1 (July 2026), sha256:a010d40ed952… — link https://cleartracedata.com/scorecard/edition-1. For a private cut of your own routing versus peers (per-pair, per-size, with the failure modes), or a subscription to future rated editions for a best-execution evidence file, book a working session.

ClearTrace is an independent measurement firm: we operate no router, no frontend, and take no order flow. Editions are immutable once published; corrections, if ever needed, ship as an errata note in the next edition — never as a silent edit. · Home · Live leaderboard · Research